Do You Really Support Free Speech?

So as the question asks, do you really support free speech. One of the best ways to know if someone truly supports free speech is to see if they are willing to stand up for the most controversial levels of free speech.

The UN wants to BAN Shota and Loli porn. For those of you who don’t know what Shota or Loli is, it’s anime of young children, sometime sexual in nature, and according to the UN, It’s a human rights violation. If you don’t believe me read what is be proposed.

TOOCUTE

“Child pornography is defined in article 2 OPSC as ‘any representation of a child engaged in real or simulated explicit sexual activities, regardless of the means used, or any representation of the sexual parts of a child for primarily sexual purposes’. The qualification ‘by whatever means’ reflects the broad range of material available in a variety of media, online and offline. It includes, inter alia: visual material such as photographs, movies, drawings and cartoons; audio representations; any digital media representation; live performances; written materials in print or online; and physical objects such as sculptures, toys, or ornaments.

“The Committee urges States parties to prohibit, by law, child sexual abuse material in any form. The Committee notes that such material is increasingly circulating online, and strongly recommends States parties to ensure that relevant provisions of their Criminal Codes cover all forms of material, including when the acts listed in article 3.1(c) are committed online and including when such material represents realistic representations of non-existing children.”

Now we can all agree that actual abuse of actual children is harmful, yet when we look at loli or shota we got to ask the very question, who is being harmed? These are drawing and fictional stories. These are not real people? No harm is done in making this kind of content, yet this worst than just banning something people don’t like but a violation of freedom of speech.

ShotaCute

Now lets talk for a minute about actual exploitative material. When actual people are being harmed and doing something against their will, you have a victim. The fact you have a victim shows you are now taking someone’s self autonomy way and they are doing something they may not want to be involved in. If this thing being proposed was actually about saving children I would have no problem with it.

Sleep

So what does any of this have to do with free speech violations? Simple as I have already stated because no one is harmed in the making of this kind of content and no ones autonomy was violated there is no reason to make it illegal. So if you want to ban something, just because it might make people uncomfortable or grossed out, then you are violating someone’s freedom of speech. We have seen time and again people wanting to ban certain speech, and yes a lot of speech is controversial, but banning it is dangerous and can lead to a government that doesn’t allow you to criticize it.

So to answer my question in the title. Do you really support free speech? Well if you are okay with the UN banning this type of content than no, you don’t support free speech. Remember just because you support someone’s right to say or read something doesn’t mean you have to agree with said content.

8 thoughts on “Do You Really Support Free Speech?

  1. Even beyond the idea of free speech, if one supports reasonable outlets for those that might have desires that when acted out would be otherwise illegal then one should support this sort of content and understand how they prevent potentially dangerous behaviours. This need not to mean one must even like loli/shota themselves. Recognising how these outlets are helpful to marginalized sectors of society is not equivalent to one liking these sorts of arts.

    As a general fact, legalization of pornography, contrary to popular belief, actually decreases the incidence of abuseful situations. But this is beside the point and constitutes as a over-endorsement of why loli/shota, which involves no actual children in it’s production (which could be and is potentially exploitative under capitalism) should be even more encouraged than ever as a method to prevent actual infringements on children’s rights. It is concerning that folks that supposedly act in the name of children are even proposing these extremely short-sighted and unfounded ideas under the pre-text of saving children.

    References:

    Diamond, M., Jozifkova, E., & Weiss, P. (2011). Pornography and Sex Crimes in the Czech Republic. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(5), 1037–1043. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9696-y

    Diamond, M., & Uchiyama, A. (1999). Pornography, Rape, and Sex Crimes in Japan. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 22(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2527(98)00035-1

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply to Bunny Rylee Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s